so hey fun fact for anyone who wants queer history trivia: the first disco in Seattle was opened in 1973 and was a gay bar called “shelly’s leg” and it was named after a dancer named shelly who lost her leg in a confetti cannon accident and used the insurance/lawsuit settlement money to open a gay disco.
Here are 10 photos (out of 22) from my series Racial Microaggressions. I have asked my friends on the Fordham University Lincoln Center campus to write down an instance of racial microaggression they have faced on a poster for me to take a picture of them.
Amazing amazing project by a #Fordham student!
Jared Bernstein, Charting A Path To Shared Prosperity
As the chart reveals, once the recoveries of the 1980s, and even more so in the 1990s, took hold, real household incomes grew at both the middle and the bottom. They grew faster at the top, as the forces of inequality increased in these years. And since all of the last three recoveries began as “jobless” and “wageless” (i.e., though gross domestic product was growing, jobs and real wages lagged), it took a while for the expansions to lift those in the middle and below. But eventually, they did.
In the 2000s, however, the recovery hardly reached the middle or poor households at all. Including this year’s stable 15 percent rate, poverty has gotten worse or stayed the same for 11 of the last 12 years.
This is a remarkable and persistent disconnection between growth and living standards. For well over a decade, households that would have gotten ahead in previous periods of our economic history have failed to do so. Even when the top was outpacing the rest, as in the 1980s and 1990s, middle and low-income households made up some ground. Poverty rates declined at least somewhat in the 1980s expansion, and fell considerably more in the full-employment economy of the latter 1990s.
If there’s one picture I could show to policy makers to wake them up to the profound costs to broad swaths of Americans of gridlock, austerity, immobility and just the general ignoring of the central economic problem — the disconnect between overall growth and shared prosperity — it would be this.
A rising tide, eh?
With New York City’s homeless population in shelters at a record high of 50,000, a growing number of New Yorkers punch out of work and then sign in to a shelter, city officials and advocates for the homeless say. More than one out of four families in shelters, 28 percent, include at least one employed adult, city figures show, and 16 percent of single adults in shelters hold jobs. Mostly female, they are engaged in a variety of low-wage jobs as security guards, bank tellers, sales clerks, computer instructors, home health aides and office support staff members. At work they present an image of adult responsibility, while in the shelter they must obey curfews and show evidence that they are actively looking for housing and saving part of their paycheck. Advocates of affordable housing say that the employed homeless are proof of the widening gap between wages and rents — which rose in the city even during the latest recession — and, given the shortage of subsidized housing, of just how difficult it is to escape the shelter system, even for people with jobs.
Torn between THIS JUST IN and ALWAYS REBLOG. Posting either way.(via slavin)
Awful and disgraceful.
Your greatest challenge is…
believing in yourself
The way forward is…
to understand that from the moment of conception you were already a winner. Look at any baby; selfbelief is your birth right.
You’re drawn to people born on…
March 21 to April 19
You have much to learn and love from each other, and a great deal more in common than you think.
Balance is crucial if you want to deal more effectively with life. So if you aren’t feeling at your best, ask yourself whether you have taken care of yourself physically, mentally, emotionally, and spiritually.
People born on October 18 often have a regal, dignified air about them; from their early years expectations will have been high for them to achieve great success. As the years go by, more often than not they do fulfill those expectations by rising to the top; but although they long to make their mark on the world, another part of them longs to run away and hide.
With all the imagination, intellect and talent to blaze exciting trails in life, their need for the approval of others can crush their selfesteem and stop them developing to their full potential. Perhaps in childhood they were criticized or neglected too much; lasting feelings of inadequacy and insecurity continue to haunt them, however successful they are. It is therefore vital for their psychological growth that they work on rebuilding their vulnerable selfesteem. If they don’t, they will be like reeds blown in the wind, flying high when others applaud them but falling down when the praise or support isn’t there.
From the age of five until the age of thirty-five there is a growing emphasis for people born on this day on emotional change, power and transformation, and opportunities will be presented to them to take control of their lives. They must take advantage of these by becoming more proactive and saying “no” to others who seek to take advantage of them. Once they get a handle on their insecurities and realize their own worth, there is nothing they cannot achieve. When they approach their forties and beyond, there is another turning point when life will call upon them to be more adventurous, and it is more important than ever for them to leave self-doubt aside.
This is because once they see what everybody else sees and realize what creative, courageous and inspirational individuals they really are, they have the potential not just to promote the happiness of themselves and others but to be an inspirational force for the common good.
On the dark side
Self-sacrificing, stressed, approval-seeking
At your best
Dignified, inspirational, giving
Love Don’t give too much
There is a danger for people born on October 18 of giving more than they receive in relationships, and it is important for them to have the courage to stand up for themselves and to walk away from relationships that are damaging to their self-worth. Although charming and friendly they, may be reserved when it comes to attracting partners. But once they do find someone who can love and support them and make them feel good about themselves, they can be affectionate, loyal and expressive lovers.
Health Tiger’s eye
Lots of physical activity is essential for people born on this day, not just because they have a lot of energy but also because it will help boost their selfesteem. All forms of exercise are recommended, in particular swimming and dancing. A regular stretching routine is also advised, especially if they are prone to aches and pains. As far as diet is concerned, portion control is advised as they tend to have a larger-than-life appetite, possibly setting themselves up for weight and health problems. It is important for them to avoid too much stress and not to overburden themselves with responsibilities and commitments to others; “no” is a word they need to practice saying more often. Meditation and visualization techniques will help build their self-confidence. Carrying a tiger’s eye crystal will also help boost their confidence, as will wearing the color orange.
Career Born translators
These people will often be drawn to creative means of expression such as art, writing, acting, and music, but they may also put their imaginative talents to good use in education, sales, promotion, advertising, and social reform. A gift for communication and language may draw them to careers in translation or work in foreign countries.
Destiny To inspire and benefit others with their discoveries
The life path of people born on this day is to believe more in themselves, their creativity and their inner strength. Once they understand the importance of building their selfesteem, their destiny is to further their quest for knowledge, and inspire and benefit others with their discoveries.
“I am talented and creative; the only approval I really need is my own”
Signs & symbols
Sun sign: Libra
Ruling planet: Venus, the lover
Symbol: The Scales
Birth date ruler: Mars, the warrior
Tarot card: Moon (imagination)
Favorable numbers: 1, 9
Lucky days: Friday and Tuesday, especially when these days fall on 1 and 9 of the month
Lucky colors: Pink, lavender, red
OMG you guys! This tumblr is addictive.
A person was just trying to argue with me via twitter about the ESA’s statistic that 45% of gamers are women. Please allow me to clear up a few things:
Yes, those statistics include browser and mobile games. Yes, those games statistically have a higher percentage of women players. Yes the inclusion of those types of games will therefore tend to push the overall percentage toward women. All of those things are true and uncontroversial, but people keep bringing up these things as though it “proves” women are still a small minority of gamers.
There are two gigantic problems with that. The first is that it necessarily implies that browser and mobile games aren’t “real” games. This is of course complete and total bullshit. Not only is it elitist, but it’s also just plain ignorant. Are there tons of completely worthless games in these categories? Of course, but there are also absolutely brilliant games every bit as fun, interesting, and deep as AAA “hardcore” games.
The second problem with these arguments against the 45% figure, a problem so big and nasty you want to sic a couple of Jaegers on it, is the motivation behind it - these people are trying SO HARD to exclude women from the medium. When a normal, decent person hears “Women now comprise 45% of gamers” they think “Huh, that’s cool.” But when a certain segment of the population hears that, they immediately shout “No way, that’s not possible! There must be a flaw in the data!” and go into automatic defense mode, trying everything they can to discredit the information, because they don’t want to believe it. They want to keep their little boys-only clubhouse just for them, even though it has never been just for them; women have always played videogames.
This is my main issue with these study-deniers. The “hardcore” snobbery is bad enough, but it’s the blatant misogyny that really pushes my buttons. They want to twist this data to make it false, because that way they can still feel justified in dropping rape jokes on forums and sexually harassing women on Xbox Live and whining about female protagonists. If they can fool themselves (and others) into believing that women aren’t a huge part of the gaming population, then they can keep on harassing, marginalizing and excluding them.
So the bottom line is this: the next time one of you guys wants to come in here and say “That figure’s not accurate!” or “But if you take out Facebook games…” just stop. Most of what you will say is already widely accepted. The numbers are easily understood. What is more difficult to understand is your pathetic need to “prove” that women aren’t important. Whether the number is 45% or 35% or 65%, the fact is that women are a part of the gaming community. They’ve been here from the beginning, they belong here just as much as you do, and they’re not going anywhere. It’s time to accept that.
also, I just want to add, whether you believe mobile or browser games are real games or not, you can’t deny that the fact that so many women play these games shows that many women already have an interest in video games or, at the very least, have the potential to have an interest in video games. The fact that the majority of women gravitate toward mobile and browser games is probably due to the fact that the majority of the creators of those games don’t exclude women from their advertisements, actively dissuade them from buying the games, or, at the very least, don’t have enough money to create advertisements or develop a fan community that could do either of those things. Oh, and the fact that most of these games are easily accessible and on a phone, a product that is sold and promoted equally to all genders by several companies, probably helps a lot too.
Pretty much every hobby/interest has a hierarchy in which “people who like this one specific type of [thing]” are considered more “hardcore” than “people who like this other specific type of [thing].” For example, say you read a lot of dystopian sci-fi YA novels. You might read HUNDREDS of them, but you will be considered less “serious” about sci-fi fiction fandom than someone who mostly reads hard sci-fi, reads tons of short stories on Tor, in Analog/Asimov’s, etc. In basically any male-dominated [hobby/interest], this hierarchy will be gendered, in that those interests viewed as more masculine will be at the top of the heap. (Those will usually be considered more difficult, or requiring more skill to interpret/perform correctly.)
So this is no surprise.
In addition to the mobile issue, casual games are also much easier to play, well, casually; I play casual games every day (currently Candy Crush Saga— I’m in the 250s right now; a pretty bad Popcap Solitaire Blitz game; and Bingo Bash, but they change every few months or so) and have for years and years and years, but I can play a round on the subway, or while I’m waiting on line, or in bed. They aren’t expensive, they assume a low baseline skill set to start (of course Candy Crush gets hella, hella hard, but you’re eased into it), and they are often cute or at least well-designed (think of the plants in the first PvZ, or the pigs in Angry Birds). No finely-developed twitch skills, $60 games [although I’ve easily spent more than that on CC, as ashamed as I am to say], or bloodshed required.
And noticed that I had a bio. This is alicetiara, circa 2000:
“Me = indie geek, thrift ho, theory slut, glam lush. In love with the world. Desires = own pink El Camino, go to the pyramids, write brilliant critical work. Likes = pink, rhinestones, girl punk rock, bracelets, fake meat, the Jade Pagoda, hoop earrings, bell hooks, foucault, dada, feminist art, Le Tigre, Idlewild, DIY fashion, Cyndi Lauper, cigarettes, sunshine, tiny dogs wearing berets, Bill Clinton and Kirsten Dunst. Punk rock points = 0. DORK = COOL = LOVE”
Perhaps the first time I’ve EVER wanted to be in my early 20s again.
Pretty genius article on Jeffrey Campbell and his signature platform bootie, the Lita. I’ve worn Campbell since the early 2000s: my first pair was an extremely pointy two-tone gold lame wedge flat which I wore everywhere (I LOVED LOVED LOVED the pointy-toed flat of 2002-2005). Along with Irregular Choice, they were the shoes of record for a certain brand of hipster girl back in the day.